| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/12/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
26/05/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
CORONADO, E. N. H.; DEXTER, K. G.; PENNINGTON, R. T.; CHAVE, J.; LEWIS, S. L.; ALEXIADES, M. N.; ALVAREZ, E.; OLIVEIRA, A. A. de; AMARAL, I. L.; ARAUJO-MURAKAMI, A.; ARETS, E. J. M. M.; AYMARD, G. A.; BARALOTO, C.; BONAL, D.; BRIENEN, R.; CERÓN, C.; VALVERDE, F. C.; DI FIORE, A.; FARFAN-RIOS, W.; FELDPAUSCH, T. R.; HIGUCHI, N.; HUAMANTUPA-CHUQUIMACO, I.; LAURANCE, S. G.; LAURANCE, W. F.; LÓPEZ-GONZALEZ, G.; MARIMON, B. S.; MARIMON-JUNIOR, B. H.; MONTEAGUDO MENDOZA, A.; NEILL, D.; CUENCA, W. P.; PEÑUELA MORA, M. C.; PITMAN, N. C. A.; PRIETO, A.; QUESADA, C. A.; ANGULO, H. R.; RUDAS, A.; RUSCHEL, A. R.; REVILLA, N. S.; SALOMÃO, R. P.; ANDRADE, A. S. de; SILMAN, M. R.; SPIRONELLO, W.; STEEGE, H. ter; TERBORGH, J.; TOLEDO, M.; GAMARRA, L. V.; VIEIRA, I. C. G.; TORRE, E. V.; VOS, V.; PHILLIPS, O. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado, University of Leeds; Kyle G. Dexter, University of Edinburgh / Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh; R. Toby Pennington, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh; Jérôme Chave, CNRS & Université Paul Sabatier; Simon L. Lewis, University of Leeds / University College London; Miguel N. Alexiades, University of Kent; Esteban Alvarez, Jardín Botânico de Medellín; Atila Alves de Oliveira, Projeto TEAM - INPA; Iêda L. Amaral, PROJETO TEAM - INPA; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami, Museo de Historia Natural Noel Kempff Mercado & Universidad Autonoma Gabriel Rene Moreno; Eric J. M. M. Arets, Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre; Gerardo A. Aymard, UNELLEZ-Guanare, Programa del Agro y el Mar, Herbario Universitario (PORT); Christopher Baraloto, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique / Florida International University; Damien Bonal, INRA-Université de Lorraine; Roel Brienen, University of Leeds; Carlos Cerón, Universidad Central del Ecuador; Fernando Cornejo Valverde, Andes to Amazon Biodiversity Program; Anthony Di Fiore, University of Texas; William Farfan-Rios, Wake Forest University; Ted R. Feldpausch, University of Exeter; Niro Higuchi, INPA; Isau Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco; Susan G. Laurance, Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science (TESS) and School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University; William F. Laurance, Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science (TESS) and School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University; Gabriela López-Gonzalez, University of Leeds; Beatriz S. Marimon, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso; Ben Hur Marimon-Junior, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso; Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, JardíN Botánico de Missouri; David Neill, Universidad Estatal Amazónica; Walter Palacios Cuenca, Universidad Técnica del Norte & Herbario Nacional del Ecuador; Maria Cristina Peñuela Mora, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam; Nigel C. A. Pitman, Duke University / The Field Museum; Adriana Prieto, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Carlos A. Quesada, INPA; Hirma Ramirez Angulo, Universidad de Los Andes; Agustín Rudas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; ADEMIR ROBERTO RUSCHEL, CPATU; Norma Salinas Revilla, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco / University of Oxford; Rafael P. Salomão, MPEG; Ana Segalin de Andrade, INPA; Miles R. Silman, Wake Forest University; Wilson Spironello, PROJETO TEAM - INPA; Hans ter Steege, Naturalis Biodiversity Center / Utrecht University; John Terborgh, Duke University; Marisol Toledo, Instituto Boliviano de Investigación Forestal / Universidad Autónoma Gabriel René Moreno; Luis Valenzuela Gamarra, Jardín Botánico de Missouri; Ima C. G. Vieira, MPEG; Emilio Vilanova Torre, Universidad de Los Andes; Vincent Vos, Universidad Autónoma del Beni; Oliver L. Phillips, University of Leeds. |
|
Título: |
Phylogenetic diversity of Amazonian tree communities. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Diversity and Distributions, v. 21, n. 11, p. 1295-1307, Nov. 2015. |
|
DOI: |
10.1111/ddi.12357 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
To examine variation in the phylogenetic diversity (PD) of tree communities across geographical and environmental gradients in Amazonia. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Diversidade; Filogenética. |
|
Thesagro: |
Árvore. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Amazonia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/136175/1/Coronado.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02180naa a2200769 a 4500
001 2032444
005 2022-05-26
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1111/ddi.12357$2DOI
100 1 $aCORONADO, E. N. H.
245 $aPhylogenetic diversity of Amazonian tree communities.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2015
520 $aTo examine variation in the phylogenetic diversity (PD) of tree communities across geographical and environmental gradients in Amazonia.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aÁrvore
653 $aDiversidade
653 $aFilogenética
700 1 $aDEXTER, K. G.
700 1 $aPENNINGTON, R. T.
700 1 $aCHAVE, J.
700 1 $aLEWIS, S. L.
700 1 $aALEXIADES, M. N.
700 1 $aALVAREZ, E.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. A. de
700 1 $aAMARAL, I. L.
700 1 $aARAUJO-MURAKAMI, A.
700 1 $aARETS, E. J. M. M.
700 1 $aAYMARD, G. A.
700 1 $aBARALOTO, C.
700 1 $aBONAL, D.
700 1 $aBRIENEN, R.
700 1 $aCERÓN, C.
700 1 $aVALVERDE, F. C.
700 1 $aDI FIORE, A.
700 1 $aFARFAN-RIOS, W.
700 1 $aFELDPAUSCH, T. R.
700 1 $aHIGUCHI, N.
700 1 $aHUAMANTUPA-CHUQUIMACO, I.
700 1 $aLAURANCE, S. G.
700 1 $aLAURANCE, W. F.
700 1 $aLÓPEZ-GONZALEZ, G.
700 1 $aMARIMON, B. S.
700 1 $aMARIMON-JUNIOR, B. H.
700 1 $aMONTEAGUDO MENDOZA, A.
700 1 $aNEILL, D.
700 1 $aCUENCA, W. P.
700 1 $aPEÑUELA MORA, M. C.
700 1 $aPITMAN, N. C. A.
700 1 $aPRIETO, A.
700 1 $aQUESADA, C. A.
700 1 $aANGULO, H. R.
700 1 $aRUDAS, A.
700 1 $aRUSCHEL, A. R.
700 1 $aREVILLA, N. S.
700 1 $aSALOMÃO, R. P.
700 1 $aANDRADE, A. S. de
700 1 $aSILMAN, M. R.
700 1 $aSPIRONELLO, W.
700 1 $aSTEEGE, H. ter
700 1 $aTERBORGH, J.
700 1 $aTOLEDO, M.
700 1 $aGAMARRA, L. V.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, I. C. G.
700 1 $aTORRE, E. V.
700 1 $aVOS, V.
700 1 $aPHILLIPS, O. L.
773 $tDiversity and Distributions$gv. 21, n. 11, p. 1295-1307, Nov. 2015.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
|
Data corrente: |
23/11/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/11/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
GAMARRA, E. L.; MORAIS, M. da G.; ALMEIDA, R. G. de; PALUDETTO, N. A.; PEREIRA, M.; OLIVEIRA, C. C. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
Érick Lemes Gamarra, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - FAMEZ/ Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS; Maria da Graça Morais, Prof., UFMS/FAMEZ, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal; ROBERTO GIOLO DE ALMEIDA, CNPGC; Natália Aguiar Paludetto, Analista Instrumental/Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente, SEMMA; Mariana Pereira, FAMEZ/UFMS; Caroline Carvalho de Oliveira, Discente de Doutorado em Ciência Animal, FAMEZ/UFMS. |
|
Título: |
Beef cattle production in established integrated systems. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 38, n. 5, p. 3241-3252, set./out. 2017. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Título em português: Produção de bovinos de corte em sistemas de integração estabelecidos. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The aim of the current study is to assess three integrated systems presenting different eucalyptus tree densities due to animal and forage production. The following integrated systems were assessed: croplivestock- forest with 357 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF1); crop-livestock-forest with 227 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF2); and crop-livestock with 5 remnant native trees ha-1 (ICL). The randomized block experimental design was applied in a split-plot scheme with four replicates. The Average Daily Gain (ADG, g animal-1day-1) and the live-weight gain per area (LWG, kg ha-1) were applied to analyze animal performance, which was set by weighing the animals every 28 days (the animals previously fasted for 16h). Forage yield was higher in ICL during fall and winter; in summer, it did not differ from ICLF2. There was no forage yield difference between the ICL and ICLF2 systems in any of the assessed seasons; summer was more productive in ILPF1 than other seasons. The highest leaf crude protein contents (CP) in summer was recorded in systems ICLF1 and ICLF2, and the highest value recorded in fall was found in ILPF1; the lowest was found in ILP. On the other hand, the highest leaf NDF contents in summer were found in ILP. The highest ADG were found in summer. The highest LWG values recorded for the ICL and ICLF2 systems were collected in summer and fall; there was no difference in any of the three systems in winter. The LWG was higher in all system in summer. The ICLF2 emerged as the system (with trees) most appropriate for beef cattle production. Despite the shading interference on forage production, such condition is compensated by the best nutritional contents such as CP. The ICLF2 system allowing an annual LWG of 83% in relation to the ICL system during the fifth year of establishment of the systems. MenosThe aim of the current study is to assess three integrated systems presenting different eucalyptus tree densities due to animal and forage production. The following integrated systems were assessed: croplivestock- forest with 357 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF1); crop-livestock-forest with 227 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF2); and crop-livestock with 5 remnant native trees ha-1 (ICL). The randomized block experimental design was applied in a split-plot scheme with four replicates. The Average Daily Gain (ADG, g animal-1day-1) and the live-weight gain per area (LWG, kg ha-1) were applied to analyze animal performance, which was set by weighing the animals every 28 days (the animals previously fasted for 16h). Forage yield was higher in ICL during fall and winter; in summer, it did not differ from ICLF2. There was no forage yield difference between the ICL and ICLF2 systems in any of the assessed seasons; summer was more productive in ILPF1 than other seasons. The highest leaf crude protein contents (CP) in summer was recorded in systems ICLF1 and ICLF2, and the highest value recorded in fall was found in ILPF1; the lowest was found in ILP. On the other hand, the highest leaf NDF contents in summer were found in ILP. The highest ADG were found in summer. The highest LWG values recorded for the ICL and ICLF2 systems were collected in summer and fall; there was no difference in any of the three systems in winter. The LWG was higher in all system in summer. The ICLF2 emerged as the sys... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Capim-piatã; Densidade de árvore; Integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta; Produção de forragem; Tree density. |
|
Thesagro: |
Eucalipto. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Eucalyptus; Forage yield. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/167393/1/Beef-cattle-production-in-established-integrated-systems.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02756naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2080620
005 2017-11-23
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aGAMARRA, E. L.
245 $aBeef cattle production in established integrated systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
500 $aTítulo em português: Produção de bovinos de corte em sistemas de integração estabelecidos.
520 $aThe aim of the current study is to assess three integrated systems presenting different eucalyptus tree densities due to animal and forage production. The following integrated systems were assessed: croplivestock- forest with 357 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF1); crop-livestock-forest with 227 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF2); and crop-livestock with 5 remnant native trees ha-1 (ICL). The randomized block experimental design was applied in a split-plot scheme with four replicates. The Average Daily Gain (ADG, g animal-1day-1) and the live-weight gain per area (LWG, kg ha-1) were applied to analyze animal performance, which was set by weighing the animals every 28 days (the animals previously fasted for 16h). Forage yield was higher in ICL during fall and winter; in summer, it did not differ from ICLF2. There was no forage yield difference between the ICL and ICLF2 systems in any of the assessed seasons; summer was more productive in ILPF1 than other seasons. The highest leaf crude protein contents (CP) in summer was recorded in systems ICLF1 and ICLF2, and the highest value recorded in fall was found in ILPF1; the lowest was found in ILP. On the other hand, the highest leaf NDF contents in summer were found in ILP. The highest ADG were found in summer. The highest LWG values recorded for the ICL and ICLF2 systems were collected in summer and fall; there was no difference in any of the three systems in winter. The LWG was higher in all system in summer. The ICLF2 emerged as the system (with trees) most appropriate for beef cattle production. Despite the shading interference on forage production, such condition is compensated by the best nutritional contents such as CP. The ICLF2 system allowing an annual LWG of 83% in relation to the ICL system during the fifth year of establishment of the systems.
650 $aEucalyptus
650 $aForage yield
650 $aEucalipto
653 $aCapim-piatã
653 $aDensidade de árvore
653 $aIntegração lavoura-pecuária-floresta
653 $aProdução de forragem
653 $aTree density
700 1 $aMORAIS, M. da G.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, R. G. de
700 1 $aPALUDETTO, N. A.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, M.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, C. C. de
773 $tSemina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina$gv. 38, n. 5, p. 3241-3252, set./out. 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Corte (CNPGC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
